As with everyone else, I love this statement from the ruling:
A citizen may not be required to offer a ―good and substantial reason‖ why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The right‘s existence is all the reason he needs.
My place to rant and rave. Topics will range from firearms, politics, current events, and general life. Beware, I use naughty language.
A citizen may not be required to offer a ―good and substantial reason‖ why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The right‘s existence is all the reason he needs.

0 comments:
Post a Comment